You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I've been thinking about parallels and differences between the slice category over A and the objects and morphisms in mapped to by the Hom(-, A) functor. It seems like we can define a functor to get something like a natural ismorphism defined by inclusion of a morphism into its hom-set that sends to and commutative diagram to the pullback . Assuming the hom functor and are from the same categories (which they aren't, for the record), a natural isomorphism could be constructed by taking for all hom-sets mapped to by the functors.
Anyway, I'm curious to hear if there's a nicer category-theoretic way to think of the similarities between and Hom(-, A), and situations where thinking about morphisms in a category using one or the other is more useful
There is a famous equivalence between the slice of presheaves and presheaves on the slice, .
Oh this'll be fun to play around with and see if I can find and make sense of the equivalence myself, thanks for putting me on :)
A reference for this is in the book by Kashiwara and Schapira, "Categories and sheaves". I don't have a copy on hand so i can't tell you where.