Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Should we replace two objects with their product?


view this post on Zulip Julius Hamilton (Sep 21 2024 at 18:42):

If it turns out that for two fixed objects X,YOb(C)X, Y \in Ob(C), X×YX \times Y exists, does that mean we should just “forget about XX and YY”? It sounds like we can make our category simpler by getting rid of XX and YY.

view this post on Zulip John Baez (Sep 21 2024 at 20:33):

No, you should not forget about XX and YY. For example, the 6-element set {1,2,3,4,5,6}\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 \} is the product of {1,2}\{1, 2\} and {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\}. But this does not mean we should forget about those other sets.

All this is a fancy way of saying "just because 6=2×36 = 2 \times 3, that doesn't mean you should get rid of 22 and 33". For one thing, if you did, you couldn't say 6=2×36 = 2 \times 3 anymore! For another, I really like the numbers 22 and 33.

view this post on Zulip Julius Hamilton (Sep 21 2024 at 22:40):

Awesome, thx

view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Sep 22 2024 at 03:52):

Part of the definition of a category theoretic product X×YX \times Y is the data of XX and YY, since one needs them to define the morphisms from X×YX \times Y to XX and YY and then to assert the universal property that this span is the terminal span to XX and YY.

view this post on Zulip David Michael Roberts (Sep 22 2024 at 08:38):

I think John's example doesn't convey the sense of violence of removing sets from the category. If one removed _all_ two-element sets and all three-element sets (which is the only thing that would make a material difference, not just removing one such pair), then your category suddenly is much poorer for structure. Certain colimits would fail to exist, I think. Moreover, if you did this with one-element sets, since every set is isomorphic to the product of itself with a one-element set, you would lose terminal objects, and in fact you could accidentally throw out all the objects!

view this post on Zulip Julius Hamilton (Sep 23 2024 at 13:57):

I see, thank you.