Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Question about generation of inner anodyne morphisms


view this post on Zulip Jack McKoen (Jan 22 2025 at 20:17):

I'm trying to formalize a proof that inner anodyne morphisms are generated (in the weakly saturated sense) by certain pushout-products--those of the form (Λ12Δ2)(ΔnΔn)(\Lambda^2_1 \hookrightarrow \Delta^2) \square (\partial \Delta^n \hookrightarrow \Delta^n). In particular I'm trying to understand Lemma 78.5 in https://rezk.web.illinois.edu/quasicats.pdf (or the second half of https://kerodon.net/tag/007F).

I'm stuck on explicitly showing that the pushout-products (Λ12Δ2)(ΔnΔn)(\Lambda^2_1 \hookrightarrow \Delta^2) \square (\partial \Delta^n \hookrightarrow \Delta^n) are generated by inner horn inclusions ΛinΔn\Lambda^n_i \hookrightarrow \Delta^n. In Rezk's proof (screenshot attached), we take the pushout and attach simplices in a certain order until we present the pushout-product as a composition of inclusions, with each inclusion fitting into a pushout diagram with an inner horn inclusion. Rezk says that this process reduces to a list of elementary observations (I understand why the observations are true).

My problem is that I don't know how to explicitly construct the pushout diagrams from this information. For example, for the first inclusion where we attach σ00\sigma_{00} to the pushout K=(Λ12×Δn)(Δ2×Δn)K = ( \Lambda^2_1 \times \Delta^n) \coprod (\Delta^2 \times \partial \Delta^n), we want to have a pushout diagram with Λ1n+1σ00\Lambda^{n + 1}_{1} \hookrightarrow \sigma_{00} on the left and KKσ00K \hookrightarrow K \cup \sigma_{00} on the right. I'm not sure how the list of observations helps to construct the horizontal maps Λ1n+1K\Lambda^{n + 1}_{1} \rightarrow K and σ00Kσ00\sigma_{00} \rightarrow K \cup \sigma_{00}.

I'd appreciate some help to understand this!

image.png