You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
In Lack's Non-Canonical Isomorphisms, there is a claim that any category with finite products and finite coproducts and any natural family of isomorphisms, becomes semi-additive. This is part of the proof:
The isomorphism goes from to , so I presume that the square on the left is shorthand for
This seems to assume that the square on the top commutes which I'm not able to derive from the rest of the assumptions. I have a similar problem with the square on the right in the first screenshot.
I'd appreciate any help with this: either I've decomposed the diagram incorrectly, or I'm missing something that makes the square on top of the second diagram commute. Thanks!
If we know that is both the initial and terminal object then I think we can prove the top square commutes. Are we allowed to know that at this point in the argument?
Put and in the natural isomorphism above:
Oh, that is already in the first screenshot. (Pointed means initial and terminal object coincide.)
Thanks @Ralph Sarkis! In this case, I don't think we have , but just the projection , which gives a map , which forces
The terminal object is always the unit of the product: for any . Dually, the initial object is always the unit of the coproduct: for any . The first sentence of the proof in the screenshot seems to make this more complicated than it is.
You're right, sorry. For some reason I skipped the in and thought that was using