You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I've heard it claimed that there's a representation theorem that says that any quantale is equivalent to the powerset of the underlying set of a monoid. If we categorify to and a monoid to a monoidal category, we get a topos of presheaves on a monoidal category. Can someone point me at literature that explores this relationship?
It also seems like we can generalize powerset to in an arbitrary topos; can we generalize presheaves on a monoidal category to V-presheaves on a V-enriched monoidal category?
I've heard it claimed that there's a representation theorem that says that any quantale is equivalent to the powerset of the underlying set of a monoid.
Who's running around claiming this? I have trouble believing it.
I imagine the result @Mike Stay is referring to is Brown–Gurr's A representation theorem for quantales.
We define a relational quantale to be a quantale whose elements are relations on a set A, ordered by inclusion and forming a monoid under relational composition. Such quantales have been studied in several areas of theoretical computer science, and constitute a sound and complete class of models for non-commutative linear logic. We show that every quantale is isomorphic to a relational quantale, and investigate the classification of quantales according to properties of their representations as relational quantales.
@Nathanael Arkor Thanks!
Nishizawa–Furusawa's Relational Representation Theorem for Powerset Quantales has another representation result that has some nicer properties.
Note that these are restricted subclasses of quantales (e.g. the completely coprime algebraic quantales), which may not be so evident to express as Bénabou cosmoi.