Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Product Preserving Functor


view this post on Zulip Cecilia Campani (Apr 01 2024 at 13:58):

Hello everyone! I have (probably) a simple question to make: do product preserving functor commutes with projections? I.e., if F: C \rightarrow D is a product preserving functor, axb is the product of a, b obects in C, and p_a and p_b are the projections, does it hold that F(p_a)=P_F(a) and F(p_b)=P_F(b)? I tried to prove it but without succes, I think F must be full and surjective on objects but I'm still not sure about it.

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Apr 01 2024 at 14:06):

Hi! In brief, yes it's true that the projections are preserved. To give you the most helpful explanation of why, could you tell me what definition of product-preserving functor you are working with?
(PS. you can use double dollar signs for inline equations e.g. F(pa)F(p_a).)

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Apr 01 2024 at 14:09):

Beware that an object can be a product of two objects in several ways. That is, the projections are part of the data of the product, and another choice of projections can sometimes be possible making the same object a product in a different way. Products are online unique up to unique isomorphism. So it doesn't necessarily make sense to demand that FF sends given product projections to "the" product projections from the image of FF; rather you need to check that the images F(pa),F(pb)F(p_a), F(p_b) present F(a×b)F(a \times b) as a product.

view this post on Zulip Cecilia Campani (Apr 01 2024 at 14:34):

Yes, I'm working with the definition of n-Lab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/product-preserving+functor.

view this post on Zulip Cecilia Campani (Apr 01 2024 at 14:35):

Thank you so much for the help, also for the P.s.!

view this post on Zulip Cecilia Campani (Apr 01 2024 at 14:36):

So, you mean that I have to check if the two maps satisfy the universal property of the product, right?

view this post on Zulip Ralph Sarkis (Apr 01 2024 at 14:49):

If you don't know FF preserves products, then yes, you need to show FπXF\pi_X and FπYF\pi_Y satisfy the universal property of the product FX×FYFX \times FY, and if you can do that for all XX and YY that have a product, then you can conclude FF preserves products.
If you know FF preserves products, then you also know (by definition) that FπXF\pi_X and FπYF\pi_Y satisfy the universal property.

It is a good exercise to come up with a functor that satisfies F(X×Y)=FX×FYF(X\times Y) = FX \times FY, but yet does not preserve the projections (hence does not preserve products).

view this post on Zulip Cecilia Campani (Apr 01 2024 at 16:55):

Eventually, I proved what I needed to! But thanks for the help, really appreciated!