You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Hello everyone! I have (probably) a simple question to make: do product preserving functor commutes with projections? I.e., if F: C \rightarrow D is a product preserving functor, axb is the product of a, b obects in C, and p_a and p_b are the projections, does it hold that F(p_a)=P_F(a) and F(p_b)=P_F(b)? I tried to prove it but without succes, I think F must be full and surjective on objects but I'm still not sure about it.
Hi! In brief, yes it's true that the projections are preserved. To give you the most helpful explanation of why, could you tell me what definition of product-preserving functor you are working with?
(PS. you can use double dollar signs for inline equations e.g. .)
Beware that an object can be a product of two objects in several ways. That is, the projections are part of the data of the product, and another choice of projections can sometimes be possible making the same object a product in a different way. Products are online unique up to unique isomorphism. So it doesn't necessarily make sense to demand that sends given product projections to "the" product projections from the image of ; rather you need to check that the images present as a product.
Yes, I'm working with the definition of n-Lab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/product-preserving+functor.
Thank you so much for the help, also for the P.s.!
So, you mean that I have to check if the two maps satisfy the universal property of the product, right?
If you don't know preserves products, then yes, you need to show and satisfy the universal property of the product , and if you can do that for all and that have a product, then you can conclude preserves products.
If you know preserves products, then you also know (by definition) that and satisfy the universal property.
It is a good exercise to come up with a functor that satisfies , but yet does not preserve the projections (hence does not preserve products).
Eventually, I proved what I needed to! But thanks for the help, really appreciated!