You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
In a Boolean topos, is it consistent to assume a local ring object such that for every Weil -algebra , the canonical morphism is an isomorphism?
First thing I would try is to make the trivial ring
The trivial ring isn't local though.
Max New said:
First thing I would try is to make the trivial ring
Reid Barton said:
The trivial ring isn't local though.
The other interpretation of Max New's sentence is to prove that for any local ring in a Boolean topos, if satisfies the Kock-Lawvere axiom, then , yielding a contradiction since by definition of local ring, .
Not sure if that's what really meant by Max New since I feel like it's easier to just directly show that the evaluation map is not an isomorphism for all local rings by constructing a non-polynomial function from the nilradical of to .
If has decidable equality, then the set of nilradicals of also has decidable equality. This means that one can define any indicator function by case analysis, which is a non-polynomial function if it is not the constant function to or .
In general, I don't think the local requirement is necessary for the commutative ring , only that is non-trivial with decidable equality. If is any commutative ring, then a Weil algebra is equivalent to the quotient of a polynomial ring with generators , where by a finite set of polynomials with cardinality , where . The formal spectrum is the solution set of the polynomials , which is a subset of and thus has decidable equality if has decidable equality.
As a result, if is non-trivial, then there are non-polynomial indicator functions and so the evaluation map from to is not an isomorphism.