Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Kock-Lawvere axiom in a Boolean topos


view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Mar 01 2024 at 14:50):

In a Boolean topos, is it consistent to assume a local ring object RR such that for every Weil RR-algebra WW, the canonical morphism WRSpecR(W)W \to R^{\mathrm{Spec}_R(W)} is an isomorphism?

view this post on Zulip Max New (Mar 01 2024 at 14:54):

First thing I would try is to make RR the trivial ring

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Mar 01 2024 at 17:07):

The trivial ring isn't local though.

view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Mar 02 2024 at 16:09):

Max New said:

First thing I would try is to make RR the trivial ring

Reid Barton said:

The trivial ring isn't local though.

The other interpretation of Max New's sentence is to prove that for any local ring RR in a Boolean topos, if RR satisfies the Kock-Lawvere axiom, then 0=10 = 1, yielding a contradiction since by definition of local ring, 010 \neq 1.

Not sure if that's what really meant by Max New since I feel like it's easier to just directly show that the evaluation map is not an isomorphism for all local rings by constructing a non-polynomial function from the nilradical of RR to RR.

view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Mar 02 2024 at 16:24):

If RR has decidable equality, then the set of nilradicals DD of RR also has decidable equality. This means that one can define any indicator function D{0,1}RD \to \{0, 1\} \subseteq R by case analysis, which is a non-polynomial function if it is not the constant function to 0R0 \in R or 1R1 \in R.

view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Mar 03 2024 at 02:20):

In general, I don't think the local requirement is necessary for the commutative ring RR, only that RR is non-trivial with decidable equality. If RR is any commutative ring, then a Weil algebra WW is equivalent to the quotient of a polynomial ring R[X]R[X] with nn generators xiXx_i \in X, where 0i<n0 \leq i \lt n by a finite set of polynomials fjR[X]f_j \in R[X] with cardinality mm, where 0j<m0 \leq j \lt m. The formal spectrum SpecR(W)\mathrm{Spec}_R(W) is the solution set of the polynomials fjf_j, which is a subset of RR and thus has decidable equality if RR has decidable equality.

view this post on Zulip Madeleine Birchfield (Mar 03 2024 at 02:40):

As a result, if RR is non-trivial, then there are non-polynomial indicator functions SpecR(W){0,1}R\mathrm{Spec}_R(W) \to \{0, 1\} \subseteq R and so the evaluation map from WW to RSpecR(W)R^{\mathrm{Spec}_R(W)} is not an isomorphism.