You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
If C
is a category, what was the C(a, -)
again?
It's a functor that takes an object and produces the hom-set .
Covariant hom-functor
Also consider its action on morphisms: if is a morphism in then sends to the morphism in defined by .
what does [C, Set](C(a, -), F)
then mean? Here F is supposed to be a functor
This is the set of natural transformations from the Hom functor to .
Note that the fact that this is a set is not benign (the collection of natural transformations between two arbitrary functors may be a proper class --- or whatever is bigger than a set in your foundations), it follows from the Yoneda lemma.
This is a particular instance of the notation C(x,y) for the set of maps from x to y in C, but where the category is [C,Set], and you're looking at maps from the representable C(a,-) to some other object of [C, Set] (aka functor) F.
So, just to make sure I'm getting to getting this: [C, Set]
is the category of functors from C to Set, C(a, -) is a covariant which maps every element to its hom-set with a and
C, Set is a hom-set in the category
[C, Set]` containing natural transformations from C to Set
Your notation broke (you can use double dollar signs for writing math), but anyway only the last three words are incorrect. Natural transformations are morphisms between functors, so the hom-set contains natural transformations between and .