You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I've been looking a bit into the tensor product of cubical sets induced by the monoidal structure on the category of cubes with connection, gotten via Day convolution. I think I roughly have an idea of what these correspond to (take a k-cell and a n-cell and "multiply" them together the way you would if they were topological spaces), but I'm interested how these interact with "pasting diagrams" of cubes
As far as I can tell, the right notion of "pasting diagram" for a cube is just a cuboid - so for 1-cells it's a line, for 2-cells it's a rectangle, for 3-cells a cuboid, etc etc
taking the "collection of all pasting diagrams on a cubical set" i think is what the "free strict cubical omega-category monad" does? and then strict cubical omega-categories are just algebras for this - you can compose any cuboid to a cube
i'm trying to figure out how this monad interacts with the geometric product - in particular getting a map from
my geometric intuition tells me that this is just "a product of cuboids may be regarded as a cuboid of products", but i can't quite tell whether this actually works or if i've missed something subtle
e.g. if you have a string of 1-cubes from and 1-cubes from , then the corresponding element in is a formal product of these strings - but you should be able to view it as a rectangle of individual products of 1-cubes from and , which i think would be an element of ?