Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Geometric Product of Cubical Sets


view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:34):

I've been looking a bit into the tensor product of cubical sets induced by the monoidal structure on the category of cubes with connection, gotten via Day convolution. I think I roughly have an idea of what these correspond to (take a k-cell and a n-cell and "multiply" them together the way you would if they were topological spaces), but I'm interested how these interact with "pasting diagrams" of cubes

view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:35):

As far as I can tell, the right notion of "pasting diagram" for a cube is just a cuboid - so for 1-cells it's a line, for 2-cells it's a rectangle, for 3-cells a cuboid, etc etc

view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:36):

taking the "collection of all pasting diagrams on a cubical set" i think is what the "free strict cubical omega-category monad" does? and then strict cubical omega-categories are just algebras for this - you can compose any cuboid to a cube

view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:37):

i'm trying to figure out how this monad TT interacts with the geometric product - in particular getting a map from TXTYT(XY)TX \otimes TY \to T(X \otimes Y)

view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:38):

my geometric intuition tells me that this is just "a product of cuboids may be regarded as a cuboid of products", but i can't quite tell whether this actually works or if i've missed something subtle

view this post on Zulip Ruby Khondaker (she/her) (Jul 10 2025 at 09:39):

e.g. if you have a string of 55 1-cubes from XX and 77 1-cubes from YY, then the corresponding element in TXTYTX \otimes TY is a formal product of these strings - but you should be able to view it as a 5×75 \times 7 rectangle of individual products of 1-cubes from XX and YY, which i think would be an element of T(XY)T(X \otimes Y)?