You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I have a very simple question:
The definition of monic morphism is: . Now take a free category generated from a graph. The only morphisms we have around are:
Here equality is almost at the typographical level, the only equations we enforce are associativity and identity laws. So am I correct in thinking that any morphism in a free category is vacuously monic, since basically the only equalities we have are between stuff that is _boringly_ equal?
If that's so, does it hold also for freely generated symmetric/commutative monoidal categories?
Yes, morphisms in free categories are both monic and epic (for instance, the free monoid on n generators, which is the free category on n endomorphisms, is both left and right cancellative). The same is true for the free monoidal category... but with symmetry you have to be more careful: is , for a transposing two copies of the same object?
Regarding composition, I think it comes down to the fact that the free category generated by a graph can be explicitly described as follows:
Morgan Rogers (he/him) said:
Yes, morphisms in free categories are both monic and epic (for instance, the free monoid on n generators, which is the free category on n endomorphisms, is both left and right cancellative). The same is true for the free monoidal category... but with symmetry you have to be more careful: is , for a transposing two copies of the same object?
Generally, no. The best one can say is . But it is indeed if the category is commutative monoidal. But in that case by definition, so I don't think this is very problematic...
That sounds right to me on further thought, at which point everything is both monic and epic in these cases too!