Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Final "twisted diagonal" functors


view this post on Zulip fosco (Sep 11 2020 at 09:38):

It is well known that given a category C\cal C the following two conditions are equivalent:

  1. the diagonal functor Δ:CC×C\Delta : {\cal C} \to {\cal C}\times {\cal C} is final
  2. For every two objects X,YX,Y of C{\cal C}, the category of cospans XAYX \to A\leftarrow Y is (nonempty and?) connected.

We say that C{\cal C} is sifted if any of those conditions is true. It takes very little effort to verify that if C{\cal C} is sifted, then every diagonal functor CCn{\cal C} \to {\cal C}^n to a finite power of C{\cal C} is also final.

Where I can look for an explicit proof of the above equivalence? It seems to me that it entails the following: let \nabla be the "twisted diagonal functor" :Cop×CCop×Cop×C×C\nabla : {\cal C}^\text{op}\times {\cal C} \to {\cal C}^\text{op}\times {\cal C}^\text{op}\times {\cal C} \times {\cal C}, defined as ΔCop×ΔC\Delta_{{\cal C}^\text{op}}\times \Delta_{\cal C}. If C{\cal C} is sifted and cosifted, for example if it has products and coproducts, then \nabla is final.

Is this correct, or I'm losing something?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Sep 11 2020 at 10:42):

Which equivalence are you looking for? Aren't (1) and (2) the same, by unwrapping the definition of "final"?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Sep 11 2020 at 10:44):

("Connected" implies nonempty.)

view this post on Zulip fosco (Sep 11 2020 at 12:22):

In hindsight that was a naive question... I agree there's almost nothing to prove for 1 iff 2.

I'm looking for properties of C\cal C that imply \nabla is final.

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Sep 11 2020 at 12:38):

If you rearrange the components in the codomain of \nabla, how does it compare to the diagonal functor for Cop×C\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{op}} \times \mathcal{C}?

view this post on Zulip Morgan Rogers (he/him) (Sep 11 2020 at 12:38):

If it's the same, you have your answer as a condition on that product category