You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Categorical systems theory comes into close contact with control theory and automata theory, and it's not long venturing into this world before one encounters the pervasive duality between controllability/reachability and observability. This is very much the terrain of Kalman (from around 1960) on linear systems duality, and his work with Arbib and others (from around 1970)) providing a unified account of systems and automata. I began to sketch an nLab page about the duality at [[controllability and observability]], but there's far more to include there.
It's an easy step then to understand instances of this duality as a form of Chu duality. (Here is a sketch of why Kalman duality is a form of Chu duality.)
Since we all love duality in the CT community, one might expect to see controllability-observability duality as a prominent topic in ACT approaches to systems theory. For instance, it's present in Lyapunov theory. But outside of work on minimization of automata, I'm seeing very little. Am I missing it?
There's some things about Kalman duality in the thesis of my Phd student Riu Rodríguez Sakamoto, I should check to see whether that's become publicaly accessible yet
https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/r207tq035
Things got a bit messy when we got into the real details, not as categorically clean as I was hoping it would be. I bet there is much more to say about this topic
Perhaps @Riu Rodríguez Sakamoto will receive a ping from this
I see Riu has spoken on Decorated Para for linear quadratic regulators, right at the heart of optimal control-optimal estimator duality. Here the duality with the Kalman filter.
Did anyone working on polynomial functors consider , or perhaps for some value object ? One might consider Interaction laws of monads and comonads for this.
I've thought about as a proof relevant model of the BV logic, where sequencing is interpreted as the composition product. One compelling thing is that a "Kleene star" like construct would be modelled using the ideas in Libkind and Spivak's Pattern Runs on Matter paper.
Thanks, @Bob Atkey! Seems like there are some literatures to link up usefully.
Bob Atkey said:
...modelled using the ideas in Libkind and Spivak's Pattern Runs on Matter paper.
Do you mean for say in , something they might put as ?
One might also try instead of for some monoid . Then and there would be a multiplication map to .