Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Double semicategory?


view this post on Zulip Adittya Chaudhuri (Mar 20 2026 at 07:44):

There is a notion called semicategory, which is exactly like a category but without the requiremnent for the existence of the identity morphisms.

Recently, I came across the following situation:

I was able to construct a structure like a double category D=[D1D0]\mathbb{D}=[\mathsf{D}_{1} \rightrightarrows \mathsf{D}_{0} ], where D1\mathsf{D}_{1} is the category of arrows and D0 \mathsf{D}_{0} is the category of objects, where I could not find a natural way to define the identity assigning functor U ⁣:D0D1\mathsf{U} \colon \mathsf{D}_{0} \to \mathsf{D}_{1} . But, the composition functor  ⁣:D1×D0D1D1\circ \colon \mathsf{D}_{1} \times_{\mathsf{D}_{0} } \mathsf{D}_{1} \to \mathsf{D}_{1} makes the composition of horizontal 1-cells associative.

The above situation naturally led me to ask whether there already exists a notion of double semicategory in the literature with the same spirit as a semicategory is to a category.