You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Chasing down the definition of Weakly LCCC from this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.6997 leds to a remark 3.2 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022404999001929 and I'm blanking on seeing how the definition 3.1 and remark 3.2 are the same.
definition 3.1. says a category is weakly lccc if it has weak limits and every slice has weak simple products (defined on p2 of the second paper)
remark 3.2 says that if C has strong finite limits, then this condition can be expressed in terms of "weak representation"; for maps p: I -> J b : B -> I there is a map w: W -> J and a natural surjection C/J(-, w) ->> C/I(p*(-), b).
If anyone can explain why these are equivalent, I'd appreciate it