Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Day convolution on large categories


view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Apr 11 2024 at 17:50):

Using the definition of Day convolution as a coend it's pretty clear that they exist for all presheaves on a small categories.
Are some results known outside the small case? For example, has the case of accessible categories been worked out?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Apr 11 2024 at 18:25):

Do you mean that you are taking presheaves on a large monoidal category, and you are wondering when this is also monoidal?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Apr 11 2024 at 18:25):

If you're willing to restrict to small presheaves (which tends to be appropriate when dealing with large categories), then the resulting category of small presheaves will be monoidal.

view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Apr 11 2024 at 18:26):

Nathanael Arkor said:

Do you mean that you are taking presheaves on a large monoidal category, and you are wondering when this is also monoidal?

Yes exactly. Or at least if there are known conditions for where this holds.

view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Apr 11 2024 at 18:26):

Nathanael Arkor said:

If you're willing to restrict to small presheaves (which tends to be appropriate when dealing with large categories), then the resulting category of small presheaves will be monoidal.

Right, very nice. Is there a place where I can learn more about this?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Apr 11 2024 at 18:27):

It follows more generally for a cocompletion under a class of weights: the reference is §3 of Johnson's Monoidal Morita Equivalence.

view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Apr 11 2024 at 18:28):

Thank you! (The link is broken though.)

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Apr 11 2024 at 18:28):

I would be surprised if anything nice can be said about arbitrary presheaves, since Set doesn't have many large colimits.

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Apr 11 2024 at 18:29):

Paolo Perrone said:

Thank you! (The link is broken though.)

Ah, it's working for me; core.ac.uk is very buggy, unfortunately. You can probably find a copy elsewhere, but I can share a copy if not.

view this post on Zulip Paolo Perrone (Apr 11 2024 at 18:30):

I'll find it. Thank you!

view this post on Zulip Dylan Braithwaite (Apr 11 2024 at 18:31):

For what it's worth the first time I clicked that link I got a 404 page, but when I clicked it again it worked

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Arlin) (Apr 12 2024 at 01:08):

It seems reasonable to ask when the Day convolution exists for all presheaves on a total category. Maybe it always does.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Apr 12 2024 at 01:10):

Why would a cocompleteness property of the domain category affect the existence of colimits of presheaves on that domain?

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Arlin) (Apr 12 2024 at 01:20):

Hmm, just an instinctual reaction…maybe I had nothing deeper than “those are the categories where reasonable large colimits behave reasonably”

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Apr 12 2024 at 01:23):

Well, colimits of presheaves are pointwise, coming from colimits in Set, and Set is total.