Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Day convolution and Kan extensions


view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:26):

the Day convolution can be described as a left Kan extension of the 'external tensor product' along the tensor product (https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Day+convolution#InTermsOfCoends) . What happens if you take the right Kan extension of the same diagram?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:30):

You would get Day convolution for copresheaves (corresponding to free completion of small categories) rather than presheaves (corresponding to free cocompletion of small categories).

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:33):

say we are in simplicial sets, the Day convolution corresponds to the join operation. Would the right Kan extension do anything interesting to simplicial sets?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:38):

The reason Day convolution can be used to define operations on simplicial sets is because simplicial sets form a presheaf category. (Note that the join is Day convolution of ordinal sums: you need to specify which operation you're convolving.) If you wanted to use right Kan extensions, you would need to be interested in a copresheaf category.

view this post on Zulip Zhen Lin Low (Nov 10 2021 at 13:44):

@Nathanael Arkor I wouldn't say that. The free completion of a small category C\mathcal{C} is [C,Set]op[\mathcal{C}, \textbf{Set}]^\textrm{op}, which is definitely not to be confused with the free cocompletion of Cop\mathcal{C}^\textrm{op}.

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:47):

For simplicial sets, in that linked page, should C=Δop\mathcal{C} = \Delta^{op} or C=Δ\mathcal{C} = \Delta

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:50):

or is this the right diagram image.png

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:50):

@Zhen Lin Low: thanks, what I meant to say was the objects look the same, but the difference in morphisms is crucial.

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:54):

Nasos Evangelou-Oost said:

For simplicial sets, in that linked page, should C=Δop\mathcal{C} = \Delta^{op} or C=Δ\mathcal{C} = \Delta

It should be Δop\Delta^{op}. The notation on that page is a little unconventional, I would say.

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:54):

Because you want an operation on presheaves, i.e. functors ΔopSet\Delta^{op} \to \mathbf{Set}.

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:55):

Ok, but what stops me from taking the right Kan extension there, won't i still be a simplicial set?

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 13:56):

++ is still a monoidal operation on Δop\Delta^{op}?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 13:59):

The right Kan extension will give a monoidal structure on [Δop,Set]op[\Delta^{op}, \mathbf{Set}]^{op}, rather than on [Δop,Set][\Delta^{op}, \mathbf{Set}].

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 14:00):

Oh ok, so it would still define an operation on objects but it would turn the morphisms around the wrong way?

view this post on Zulip Nathanael Arkor (Nov 10 2021 at 14:01):

Yes: that's the crucial difference between presheaves and copresheaves.

view this post on Zulip Naso (Nov 10 2021 at 14:01):

I see now, thanks