You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
image-2e6194a8-a887-4db6-b219-b7e87bced3d1.jpg
Hey all, I'm working through Conceptual Mathematics (and loving it). I'm getting a bit stuck on some exercises so I thought it might be helpful to start a topic for help on them if others are also going through the book :)
To kick it off, I'm having trouble interpreting exercise 3 in session 15 (page 179 of the 2nd edition). I'm a bit confused about the setup and the definitions of "evaluation at 0" and "iteration".
The elements in the left hand side are functions making the square below commute.
image.png
The elements in the right hand side are elements viewed as functions .
The goal of the exercise is to show that the elements in the LHS are in correspondence with the elements in the RHS. Starting with in the LHS, there is a straightforward way to obtain an element of , apply to to obtain , this is "evaluation at 0".
The other direction is less straightforward. First, we observe that any in the LHS is completely determined by . Indeed, by the commutativity of the square above, you can derive the value of by , the value of by and so on. More concisely, you can define where denotes the iteration of times, i.e.: . Now, if you are given , you can set and iterate to find all the other values of . This yields the direction LHS -> RHS.
Finally, the exercise asks you to show the two operation we just described are inverses. Namely, if you start with , you define as above and you evaluate it at 0, you should obtain . Conversely, if you start with in the LHS and you evaluate at 0 and define as above setting you should conclude .
Thanks for the help @Ralph Sarkis :blush: it's all coming together with your explanation and diving further into the book 🤿