Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Composing two-sided discrete fibrations


view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Dec 19 2024 at 14:29):

How can one express, formally, the composition of two profunctors in terms of the corresponding two-sided discrete fibrations of categories?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 16:56):

The simplest way is to compose them as spans and then take the discrete reflection.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Dec 19 2024 at 17:19):

I guess I deserve this answer for not actually asking the real question I'm interested in :)
Given two functors F:CDF: C \to D and G:DEG: D \to E, I can take the comma categories idD/F\mathrm{id}_D/F and idE/G\mathrm{id}_E/G with the associated two-sided fibrations, which are a kind of "non-discrete" version of the two-sided discrete fibrations classifying representable profunctors induced by FF and GG.

I would like to understand the relation between the composite span of these two, with tip idD/F×DidE/G\mathrm{id}_D/F \times_D \mathrm{id}_E/G, and the comma idE/GF\mathrm{id}_E/GF. Explicitly, the latter seems to be a “coend-y” quotient of the first with respect to a two-sided action of morphisms of DD, so the relation between the two is very similar to the discrete case; but of course, since the latter is not discrete, it cannot be obtained as a discrete reflection.

I asked about the “discrete” case because it was a quicker question to ask, but actually I would like to know if there is an answer that also applies to this non-discrete variant. :)

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 17:44):

I'm pretty sure comma categories are discrete two-sided fibrations. The fiber of idD/F\mathrm{id}_D/F over cCc\in C and dDd\in D is D(d,Fc)D(d,Fc), which is a discrete set.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Dec 19 2024 at 17:52):

Oh, I got confused by the fact that the individual legs of a two-sided discrete fibration are not themselves discrete.

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Dec 19 2024 at 17:53):

(I was working under the erroneous assumption that the "discrete" span has as tip the "connected components of slices" category that shows up in the comprehensive factorisation of a functor.)

view this post on Zulip Amar Hadzihasanovic (Dec 19 2024 at 17:56):

Do you know a reference about the discrete reflection for two-sided spans, whether the discrete two-sided fibrations are the right class of a wfs, etc? The nLab was not enlightening.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 19:37):

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 19:37):

Those are all about general 2-categories.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 19:39):

Discrete fibrations and discrete opfibrations are the right classes of the [[comprehensive factorization system]] and its dual, but I don't even know what that would mean in the two-sided case, since a two-sided fibration is a span rather than a morphism.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 19 2024 at 19:39):

Discrete morphisms are the right class of some kind of factorization system, that's the "modulated" approach.