Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Composing monoids


view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 24 2020 at 15:51):

Is it correct to say that monoid objects compose precisely when there is a duoidal structure formed by the monoidal structure in which they are being composed and the monoidal structure in which they are monoids?

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Apr 24 2020 at 16:05):

What do you mean by "monoid objects compose"?

view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 24 2020 at 16:05):

For example, monoidal functors are monoids with respect to Day convolution. The composition of two monoidal functors is another monoidal functor. Coincidentally (or perhaps not so coincidentally) Day convolution and functor composition together form a duoidal structure on the functor category.

There's a couple other examples I've found so far. Day convolution also forms a duoidal structure with the "pointwise" lifting of a monoidal structure from a functor category's codomain, and again we find that the pointwise product of monoidal functors is monoidal. Another simple one is the cartesian product of monoids in Set.

Does this hold in general?

view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 24 2020 at 16:09):

@Reid Barton I mean that given some monoidal structure :C×CC\otimes : C \times C \to C and two monoids M,NM, N with respect to another monoidal structure :C×CC\oplus : C \times C \to C, MM and NN "compose" along \otimes if MNM \otimes N is also a monoid with respect to \oplus

view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 24 2020 at 16:10):

If we take C=SetC = Set and =\oplus = \otimes to be the cartesian product in SetSet, this denegerates to the statement that the product of two monoids is a monoid

view this post on Zulip Asad Saeeduddin (Apr 24 2020 at 16:19):

The intuitive explanation for the phenomenon (assuming it's not an illusion) is that monoidal functors map monoids to monoids. Thus in a duoidal structure ,\star, \diamond where \star is a lax monoidal functor cohering \diamond with itself, \star will send a pair of \diamond-monoids to a \diamond-monoid

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Apr 24 2020 at 16:21):

It's certainly true that
(a) a specific duoidal structure relating the two given monoidal structures
gives you
(b) a specific way to make the category of monoids for one of the monoidal structures monoidal using the other monoidal structure.
This is described at https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/duoidal+category#bimonoids_bicomonoids_and_duoids