You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Imagine there are 2 options for 3 independent things.
You could have , , , etc.
I claim there are possible versions of such a choice.
For things, I claim there are ways to put them in an order, because there are choices for the first position, for the second, etc.
Some of these orderings appear methodical. For example:
is an order that seems like it can be described by a rule. But other orders may appear random.
What theory analyzes which orderings are describable by a rule of some kind? Of the number of possible orderings, is there a number of orderings which are the result of a rule?
It is not specifically about orderings, but algorithmic information theory deals with this kind of question. Especially, the Kolmogorov complexity of a binary sequence is defined, roughly speaking, as the length of the shortest computer program that can generate that sequence.
The sequence is said to be random when is about the same size as the sequence itself. Intuitively, this says that there is not a better computer program than the one that just prints out the sequence.
By the way, I don't follow the step between your first example with three things, and the second one with eight things. In the second case, if you have an infinite supply of both options and , you should have sequences.