Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: Colimit in terms of a localisation


view this post on Zulip fosco (Jan 07 2021 at 21:46):

I need to tweak this seemingly well-known fact about fibered category theory, so I'm looking for a reference that spells out the proof, or at least the sketch: let F:ASetF : A \to Set be a functori, and ΣF:EA\Sigma_F : E \to A the associated discrete fibration; then

the colimit of FF coincides with the category E[CF1]E[C_F^{-1}], the localization of EE at the ΣF\Sigma_F-cartesian morphisms of EE

Using the fact that EE is nothing but the category of elements of FF, one gets a very explicit cocone Ecolim FE\to \text{colim } F sending a pair (a,xFa)(a,x\in Fa) into the image of xFax\in Fa under ιa:Facolim F\iota_a : Fa \to \text{colim } F; yet, I am still wrapping my head around what are the ΣF\Sigma_F-cartesian morphisms of EE, in order for them to yield a discrete localization!

This is certainly elementary, but that's exactly why I don't want to fight invain if the result is written somewhere else; algebraic geometers, save me! :smile:

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Jan 07 2021 at 23:07):

Aren't they all cartesian?

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Jan 07 2021 at 23:09):

In fact it makes intuitive sense: the colimit of FF is obtained by glueing along elements as prescribed by the category of elements EE. But localizing here means exactly glueing, so to get the same result you need to localize the same morphisms.

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Jan 07 2021 at 23:21):

This makes me think: maybe you want horizontal, not cartesian? Another hint of this is that one level up you localize with respect to horizontal arrows.

view this post on Zulip fosco (Jan 08 2021 at 10:06):

I don't know, there's something that does not convince me: if all morphisms are cartesian, then localising at them yields the maximally connected groupoid over the set colim F\text{colim } F, not just colim F\text{colim } F!