You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
could please someone explain to me on the page 7 here
why there are such morphisms
and why is
is not , it just restricts to it on the image of the inclusion of into -- this is a background assumption being brought in, that we are using the standard functor that takes each Ind-object to the corresponding colimit in .
The morphisms, on the other hand, exist because is -accessible and so (classically) there must be morphisms (not necessarily unique) between objects of witnessing "where the difference comes from" for any two different morphisms of . To construct them basically you take and and present them as -directed colimits of objects in , then first off correspond to cocones into . Since they are different cocones, pick a position in them where the morphisms into are different; the object that is the source of those morphisms is , and call the morphisms . The corresponding morphism in the colimiting cocone for is .
Then we have two morphisms from , a -presentable object, to , a -directed colimit. Thus factor essentially uniquely through two coprojections as . Because -directed colimits are, in particular, directed, there is a common upper bound for the indices . For take , for the coprojection , and for take .