You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I want to submit to you the following shenanigan which I find very funny to play with.
Let be an endoprofunctor on a category . Let a set, and denote still as the costant functor at .
I have a hunch that connectedness, or some sort of contractibility, of could be required; I also suspect the second property is too strong, but note that (for example) with this definition the eigenspace of for (the subcategory spanned by all eigenvectors wrt ) is closed under colimits, so it can't be too trivial a subcategory of the small-cocomplete category . Note also that the only eigenvector of hom is the terminal object, with eigenspace the whole category, as god intended.
I remember a few people that, like me, love categorifying linear algebra; @Simon Willerton might have tinkered with this idea, or maybe @Jade Master (who I remember was blogging about the analogies between matrices and quantale-enriched profunctors?)
Do you have examples to aid intuition on what these look like?
Well, if you squint your eyes a profunctor is a matrix.. and the coend computation yields almost instantaneosuly that if a profunctor results as for a copresheaf and a presheaf , then has eigenvalue the functor tensor product , with associated eigenvector .
Compare with the analogue fact of life, that if a matrix results as the tensor product , then has the dot product as eigenvalue, and eigenspace (the other eigenvalue is 0, with eigenspace an orthogonal complement of v... that's more difficult to categorify).
I have a list, now more abundant than days ago, of similar analogies. So, this problem ended up being so pretty it can be its own motivation -and I see only one path to aid intuition: trust the coends you write, and see what comes out of them.
I wonder if working with spans of as in https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05082 might make the analogies smoother
Probably a distraction, but since @Matteo Capucci (he/him) brought up that paper, 'Homotopical Linear Algebra', something I meant to return to was a couple of long comments made by Joachim Kock on the -Category Café, here, which passed seemingly unobserved.
Wherever I read Joachim, he seems to be pushing things in a homotopical direction. E.g., there's talk of some unavoidable 'homotopy overhead' in Whole-grain Petri nets and processes:
image.png
Then back here, he jumps in quickly to support a hunch I'd had on some result Tom Leinster was airing on commuting limits and colimits over groups.