You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
At first approximation, a mathematical structure in a category consists of:
For example, a monoid in a category with products consists of objects and maps such that the usual associativity and identity diagrams commute.
So I want to say that a structure in consists of:
We can package all the data into one functor by taking coproducts in , and likewise for the axioms. Usually has some further categorical structure (e.g. products, power objects, etc..) which is required to preserve, and likewise for and .
The problem I'm having is that the functor is meant to be able to reference the functor , so needs to be a functor into 'in context '. So either needs to be from into some sort of comma category relating and or it needs to be from some sort of exponential category relating and into . I'm sure theres an easy fix but its going over my head. Any help would be much appreciated.
Have you heard of sketches? They package data in approximately the way you're describing. The workaround is that the functor you mention should have codomain rather than , so the diagrams commute in already (commutativity is preserved by any functor, in particular by ).
I'll read into it. Thanks.