You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I am considering the following situation: let be a 2-category with all finite weighted limits. Then, an object is defined as follows, starting from 1-cells :
the lower square is an inserter (so in particular, f,g are parallel 1-cells), the upper right square is a comma object, and the left upper square a strict 2-pullback. Does this particular shape of limit have a name?
And I guess the asterisks are generic objects? Or a fixed object?
Generic objects, yes. Sorry I didn't y that out loud
You can assume that are endofunctors, because it's the case I am really interested in, but I don't think it changes much the general theory. I can certainly cook up a weight that presents as a limit "all at once", but it's not what I'm interested in.
What I would like is to know how I should think of L, in analogy with these wise sayings: an equalizer is "the greatest subspace where " (think about Set). A filtered colimit is "a set of germs of functions" (think about sheaves).
Ah, okay. It's common for to denote a terminal object, so that threw me for a bit.
Since you wrote and , I assume the 2-cells in the squares are pointing to the upper right. I doubt this limit has a specific name. What sort of "wise saying" would you give to describe an ordinary comma object?
Mike Shulman said:
Ah, okay. It's common for to denote a terminal object, so that threw me for a bit.
I will make it clearer!
Mike Shulman said:
Since you wrote and , I assume the 2-cells in the squares are pointing to the upper right. I doubt this limit has a specific name. What sort of "wise saying" would you give to describe an ordinary comma object?
This is completely opinion-based, but I would say it's some sort of very very generalized bundle of a category over another.
Generally I think of a bundle as being a property of a map, rather than a way of constructing a span.