You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
The following is about strict 2-categories, functors, limits, etc. In a paper (p. 109), Street remarks
In a 2-category which is both representable and oprepresentable, has a left 2-adjoint and any limit which exists in is automatically a 2-limit in .
Here representable means that has 2-pullbacks and all comma objects, and is defined on objects by , the comma object. From what I can tell, the remark is meant to follow from:
But I'm not sure what the argument is, could someone please elaborate on this? More generally, are there other nice conditions that imply that a 1-limit is also a 2-limit?
In general, for any enriching base , if a -category has copowers (aka tensors) by objects composing some strong generating family for , then any limit in is also a conical limit in , since then for each in the generators
hence (after verifying that this isomorphism is the one induced by the canonical map) . In Cat, 1 and form a strong generator, so copowers with those suffice.
Very clear explanation, thanks a lot!