Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: learning: questions

Topic: ✔ epipresheaf, powerset, contractible cover


view this post on Zulip Naso (Sep 05 2022 at 13:47):

Let (X,T)(X,\mathcal{T}) be a topological space and O:TopSetO : \mathcal{T}^{op} \to \mathcal{Set} an epipresheaf (aka conjunctive presheaf).
Let P:SetSetP : \mathcal{Set} \to \mathcal{Set} be the covariant powerset functor.
Let U={Ui}i\mathcal{U}=\{U_i\}_i be a cover of XX such that the Cech nerve NUN\mathcal{U} is contractible.

Then is it true that F:=POF := P \circ O is conjunctive w.r.t. U\mathcal{U}, i.e., does every compatible family {siFUi}i\{s_i \in F U_i \}_i (with siUiUj=sjUiUjs_i \mid_{U_i \cap U_j} = s_j \mid_{U_i \cap U_j} for all i,ji,j) come from a (possibly not unique) sFXs \in F X with sUi=si{s \mid_{U_i}} = s_i for all ii?

If it's not true I would be interested in if some extra assumptions on XX, OO or U\mathcal{U} can make it true, e.g. finiteness.

EDIT: sorry about bumping this, I was trying to delete it. I think this is a counterexample for this too.

view this post on Zulip Notification Bot (Sep 21 2022 at 09:51):

naso has marked this topic as resolved.