You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
It seems like there's not a unique "character" morphism that turns this diagram into a pullback square in Set, since could just as well pick out as :
What am I missing?
P.S. What's the latex command for the "subobject" arrow that looks like ⧽—→?
If maps the one element of to , this square would not be a pullback square.
The pullback of functions and is the set of pairs such that .
I use \hookrightarrow for monics, giving . So I'm tempted to answer the way people often do on StackExchange when people ask "how do you do X?"
Namely, "Don't do X! Do Y!" :laughing:
But someone here will know.
Looking at this, I think it might be \rightarrowtail which gives:
If maps the one element of to , this square would not be a pullback square.
Thanks, I knew it was something simple!
I presume that something similar is true when working in a topos with more truth values (e.g. multisets) and the mono on the top is so that is negation. At first glance it looked to me like the third truth value could go either to top or to bottom, but I guess one of those won't make 1 the pullback.
\rightarrowtail
Thanks!
Mike Stay has marked this topic as resolved.
Bear in mind people usually call the morphism at the bottom of the pullback square, whereas the morphism on the right side is the subobject classifier itself