You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Notations:
Lemma 1.3.2 of Elephant B states that
Let be a morphism of . Then the vertical part of the factorization of is an isomorphism iff, given any morphism with the same codomain and any factorization of through , there is a unique in with and .
The direction is straightforward, so I don't have a question there. I have a question about the given proof of the converse. Here's the proof given in the book.
If satisfies the given condition, take and ; the second component of the unique vertical factorization of through must be a two-sided inverse for .
I was able to verify that has a right inverse: by hypothesis, the unique morphism takes the form and (suppressing the coherence isomorphism). Thus, .
I was not able to prove that . Any hint is much appreciated.
Resolved.
Frank Tsai has marked this topic as resolved.