You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Specifically, if is a locally Cartesian closed category, does have a right adjoint to span composition in each variable?
James Deikun said:
Specifically, if is a locally Cartesian closed category, does have a right adjoint to span composition in each variable?
Yes! See Limit spaces and closed span categories by Brian Day.
That result is for bicategories of spans, but I imagine that a similar result holds for the double category?
Bryce Clarke has marked this topic as resolved.
James Deikun has marked this topic as unresolved.
The reference calls this out as a "widely known fact" but does not provide a proof, cite a specific reference, or recall the construction of the adjoints.
Composing with a span is the composite functor . In an LCCC both of those functors have right adjoints, hence so does their composite: .
(As a side note, in general it seems to me that only the asker of a question should mark a topic as "resolved", just as on stackexchange only the asker of a question can mark an answer as "accepted".)
Oh, huh! I didn't think of using the composition functor in the underlying category to represent the arrow composition within span composition, that perspective is greatly clarifying... or so I thought until I tried to figure out what this did to the other arrow in the span :sweat_smile:
Specifically, if I have a span I can't seem to find an arrow from the domain of to or . For example in Set when is not surjective, and and are empty sets, it seems like I need a map from a nonempty to an empty set.
Sorry, I was sloppy, I think it should be .
Ah. It's tricky to see how does the right thing to a "compressed" span, but once you do everything else becomes obvious!
James Deikun has marked this topic as resolved.