You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Street (?) showed that we can get category of fibrations over as algebras for the the monad that sends to the projection from the comma category . I'm wondering if instead we can get the (non-based) category of fibrations as the category of algebras for a monad? That is, an algebra for this monad would be a fibration over some base.
Yes, it's basically the same monad.
I mean, the monad on the category that sends to .
Right, and this works for any representable 2-category , thanks! I'm also wondering if with this monad it's somehow easier to see that is fibered over .
That should follow from the fact that the category of algebras for a fibred monad on a fibration is also a fibration.
I didn't know about that result, thank you :)
Fernando Chu has marked this topic as resolved.