You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I just stumbled across a quite nice blog post: "finance explained in commutative diagrams"
https://www.thenewflesh.net/2016/04/04/finance-explained-in-commutative-diagrams.html
This reminds me of a paper I once saw which uses linear logic and fibrations to model deontic logic (the logic of obligations, permissions, etc) to supposedly talk about contract law and the like
Found it: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570868314000573
Cool!
It actually seems pretty interesting and who knows, maybe one day this stuff could be used to automate large scale mediation of automated contracts
This is very interesting, especially the closing remarks
And well-written, I've got to say
I'm just seeing this :blush:
Finance is pretty fun. After my doctorate from UIUC and a stint at MIT Lincoln Lab, I switched careers to finance back in 2005 and have been there since.
I've maintained a math finance blog since 2007: Phorgy Phynance. The "Ph" is a homage to my days in physics and linking physics to finance :nerd:
The "no arbitrage" principle as a commuting diagram is not new. Physicists have been tinkering with finance for decades. No arbitrage is occassionally presented as parallel transport so that lack of arbitrage is related to "curvature", i.e. nontrivial parallel transport around a loop. Taking this seriously has led to an entire field of "gauge theory of finance" :sweat_smile:
Some fun things:
Some of my fun/informal articles:
Fun stuff :nerd: