You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is there anything written about "strict" localizations, ie the universal solution to mapping a set of arrows in a category to identities?
Specifically I'm looking for references for the following two statements.
Thanks!
(1) can be constructed easily as a Cat-enriched colimit, of course. But I can't recall having seen it written down.
Mike Shulman said:
(1) can be constructed easily as a Cat-enriched colimit, of course. But I can't recall having seen it written down.
Ahh yes, as enriched pushout against .
I'm trying to come up with a slick argument that for , the canonical arrow is final. One can show that
It remains to show that the localization by cocartesian arrows is actually the colimit, but I think that's straightforward by writing out the definitions.
From this, one gets a nice proof of the colimit decomposition formula [1], which says that for and with cocomplete, one has
,
where is the colimit injection.
The proof is as follows: We have since is final, and this colimit can be computed by left-Kan-extending along . By this , the first Kan-extension is computed by taking colimits over fibers, which recovers exactly the stated formula.
[1] Peschke, George, and Walter Tholen. "Diagrams, fibrations, and the decomposition of colimits." arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10890 (2020).
Jonas Frey said:
I'm trying to come up with a slick argument that for , the canonical arrow is final. One can show that
- a functor is final whenever it is "co-fully faithful", ie precomposition by is fully faithful, and
- a strict localization functor is co-fully faithful whenever it satisfies the 2-dimensional universal property.
It remains to show that the localization by cocartesian arrows is actually the colimit, but I think that's straightforward by writing out the definitions.
In case anybody is reading this, one correction: is not the "strict localization" (better: coidentifier) of at all cocartesian arrows, but at the cocartesian arrows of a split cleavage of the split opfibration . Contracting all cocartesian arrows would kill all the automorphisms, which is obviously wrong.