Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: strict localizations


view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 13 2022 at 23:19):

Is there anything written about "strict" localizations, ie the universal solution to mapping a set of arrows in a category to identities?

Specifically I'm looking for references for the following two statements.

  1. 22-categorical universal property: given a small category C\mathbb C and a set II of arrows in C\mathbb C, there exists a functor E:CL(C,I)E:\mathbb C\to L(\mathbb C, I) which which sends II-maps to identities, and such that for every category X\mathbb X, precomposition with EE induces an isomorphism of categories between [L(C,I),X][L(\mathbb C, I),\mathbb X] and the full subcategory of [C,X][\mathbb C,\mathbb X] on functors sending II-maps to identities.
  2. Given a diagram D:JCatD:\mathbb J\to\mathbf{Cat} of small categories, colim(D)\mathsf{colim}(D) can be computed as strict localization of D\int D (the covariant Grothendieck construction) at the cocartesian arrows.

Thanks!

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Dec 14 2022 at 00:20):

(1) can be constructed easily as a Cat-enriched colimit, of course. But I can't recall having seen it written down.

view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 14 2022 at 01:13):

Mike Shulman said:

(1) can be constructed easily as a Cat-enriched colimit, of course. But I can't recall having seen it written down.

Ahh yes, as enriched pushout against Δ(I)×[1]Δ(I)\Delta(I)\times[1]\to\Delta(I).

view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 14 2022 at 01:31):

I'm trying to come up with a slick argument that for D:JCatD:\mathbb J\to \mathbf{Cat}, the canonical arrow E:Dcolim(D)E : \int D\to\mathsf{colim} (D) is final. One can show that

It remains to show that the localization by cocartesian arrows is actually the colimit, but I think that's straightforward by writing out the definitions.

view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 14 2022 at 01:48):

From this, one gets a nice proof of the colimit decomposition formula [1], which says that for C:JCatC:J\to \mathsf{Cat} and D:colim(C)XD:\mathsf{colim}(C)\to\mathbb X with X\mathbb X cocomplete, one has

colim(D)=colimjJcolimcCjDσj(c)\mathsf{colim}(D) = \mathsf{colim}_{j\in J}\mathsf{colim}_{c\in C_j} D_{\sigma_j(c)},

where σj:Cjcolim(C)\sigma_j:C_j\to \mathsf{colim}(C) is the colimit injection.

The proof is as follows: We have colim(D)=colim(DE)\mathsf{colim}(D) = \mathsf{colim}(D\circ E) since EE is final, and this colimit can be computed by left-Kan-extending along CJ1\int C\to J\to 1. By this , the first Kan-extension is computed by taking colimits over fibers, which recovers exactly the stated formula.

[1] Peschke, George, and Walter Tholen. "Diagrams, fibrations, and the decomposition of colimits." arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10890 (2020).

view this post on Zulip Jonas Frey (Dec 15 2022 at 15:41):

Jonas Frey said:

I'm trying to come up with a slick argument that for D:JCatD:\mathbb J\to \mathbf{Cat}, the canonical arrow E:Dcolim(D)E : \int D\to\mathsf{colim} (D) is final. One can show that

It remains to show that the localization by cocartesian arrows is actually the colimit, but I think that's straightforward by writing out the definitions.

In case anybody is reading this, one correction: colim(D)\mathsf{colim}(D) is not the "strict localization" (better: coidentifier) of D\int D at all cocartesian arrows, but at the cocartesian arrows of a split cleavage of the split opfibration DJ\int D\to \mathbb J. Contracting all cocartesian arrows would kill all the automorphisms, which is obviously wrong.