You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I'd like to understand the quintet construction a bit better, from an abstract nonsense standpoint. So far I've always thought of it as just a nice way to get a double category from a 2-category, no more than a toy, but recently I stumbled upon a construction which spits out for some reason and I want to understand if that's a bug or a feature.
On the nLab it says
image.png
which seems interesting, but I can't find a citation or anything. Eresmann paper about quintets is quite obscure to me, since he uses notation and terminology I'm very unfamiliar with (bonus: it's in French) so I can't really understand what's going on.
Can y'all recommend some references or pointers to learn more about this?
Possibly it is in Marco Grandis and Robert Pare, Adjoints for double categories?
Ha, thanks!
There it is -- Thm 1.7!
I've been confused about this for awhile too.
I've updated the nlab page to include this reference.
That "morally" line on the page has been bothering me for maybe close to a year :upside_down:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/quintet+construction
By the way, I'm pretty sure that the "quintets" construction also has a left adjoint, which is the left Kan extension of the Gray tensor product Cat x Cat --> 2Cat along the inclusion Cat x Cat --> DblCat
That's very cool!