You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I am looking for a reference, or anything that would give me a more “conceptual” understanding of the following explicit construction, perhaps in terms of formal 2-category theory.
I'll start from a familiar example. Given a category , any morphism in induces a functor between the slices over and .
This seems to be one instance of the following general phenomenon.
Given a small category , let be the set (or discrete category) of sinks of , where an object of is a sink if the only outgoing morphism of is the identity.
(I am aware that this is not invariant under equivalence! But is supposed to be a “diagram shape”, so in most examples I have in mind it is the free category on a graph, or something quite strict like that.)
Given an -indexed family of objects of , that is a functor we can consider the category whose
Then I think we have the following:
Claim. Given a natural transformation between functors , we have a functor , given by “pushing a diagram forward along at the sinks”: that is,
The “slice category” example is the instance of this where is the walking arrow, whose only sink is its codomain.
(I didn't say what does on morphisms, but in fact a morphism of is also a diagram in whose shape -- a partially collapsed cylinder on -- has the same sinks as , and the action of is the pushforward along of this diagram)
Btw, it should be clear that, like in the slice category example, this is functorial in the sense that it defines an indexed category
I think you can generalize this by replacing by any category at all and by the [[collage]] of some profunctor . Because the inclusion is a "co-opfibration" (it's one side of a [[codiscrete cofibration]]), when you exponentiate by it you get an opfibration , which gives you your pushforwards.
Wonderful, exactly what I was hoping for! Thanks!