You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
I'm thinking about a "periodic table of string diagrams" that is to do with diagrams of n-manifolds inside of an (n+k)-dimensional manifold (probably a sphere). It starts getting tricky with 2-manifolds inside 2+k dimensional spheres. Although 2+1 seems not too tricky, and 2+2 is where knotted surfaces live, but where does it "stabilize" ? Is it in 6=2+4 dimensions? And 5 dimensions have some kind of "sylleptic" surface knots? What are these things?
As you probably know, this issue is the topic of the Tangle Hypothesis that James Dolan and I promulgated here.
The study of embeddings of n-manifolds in (n+k)-manifolds stabilizes when k = n + 2, just as the periodic table of n-categories predicts.
Sylleptic monoidal bicategories should be important for 2-manifolds knotted in 2+2+1 dimensions, just as braided monoidal categories are important for 1-manifolds knotted in 1+1+1 dimensions.
The study of knotted 2-manifolds stabilizes, and becomes boring, in 2+2+2 dimensions, just as the study of knotted 1-manifolds stabilizes in 1+1+2 dimensions.
If we were talking in person I could argue for this by waving my hands around in 5 dimensions.
In Cambridge, one of those students of Jamie you met is working on sylleptic monoidal bicategories. I tried to persuade him to look for examples to construct invariants of knotted 2-manifolds in 5-dimensional space.
image.png
Aha, thankyou, this seems to be the periodic table i was wondering about, from your paper with James Dolan.
image.png
And here is the stable ("abelian") region
I also found this mathoverflow answer discussing linked surfaces in 5d.
That's a nice answer. I've never understood the "metastable range" of homotopy theory, which comes before stabilization kicks in.
I've realized theres a glitch here. The tangles, which are pictures of globular morphisms, are poincare dual to string diagrams. I'm hoping/guessing that the tangle framing is enough structure that this is not an issue. Anyway, here is a first attempt at a Poincare dual table of string diagrams:
image.png
No, the tangles are the string diagrams - they are not Poincare dual.
Looking at these two periodic tables it seems like you are right! The dimensions are actually agreeing :-)
I think I got confused by the letters (as usual).