Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: non-split fibration


view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 21:49):

How can I see that the codomain fibration cod:C[1]C\text{cod}:\mathcal C^{[1]}\to\mathcal C in general is not a split fibration? I'm missing something in my calculations, because to me it seems that lifting f:xyf:x\to y to f1x=1yff\circ 1_x = 1_y\circ f is functorial.

view this post on Zulip Kevin Carlson (Oct 21 2024 at 22:01):

A splitting of a fibration is a choice of Cartesian lifting for every pair of an arrow ff in the base and an object in the fiber over the codomain of ff; your proposed splitting ignores the second half of this information. You may be confusing a split fibratjon with a fibration that, as a functor, is a split epimorphism. Certainly the codomain fibration is a split epi and you’ve shown why here.

view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 22:04):

ah, I see, given I'm not choosing the cartesian lift for (f:xy,ycod1(y))(f:x\to y,y'\in \text{cod}^{-1}(y)), for that I could for instance take a pullback. But then the whole construction is only pseudofunctorial

view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 22:05):

do you have any non-trivial example of split fibration to keep in mind?
I guess one could skeletalize C\mathcal C in this case

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Oct 21 2024 at 22:08):

You can take a look at the example given by Streicher in Fibered Categories a la Jean Benabou, see Warning 1 under Definition 3.1. The fibration given is the surjective group homomorphism ZZ/2Z\mathbf{Z} \to \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}, which is a Grothendieck fibration if we see the groups as one-object categories.

view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 22:08):

that fibration is not split

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Oct 21 2024 at 22:08):

This is another example of a NON-split fibration. On the other hand, if you want a split example, you can take the Fam fibration.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (Oct 21 2024 at 22:10):

Or the domain fibration.

view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 22:12):

Vincent Moreau said:

This is an example of a NON-split fibration. On the other hand, if you want a split example, you can take the Fam fibration.

This is fibred in sets, right? I would consider this example trivial: every such fibration is split. For the codomain fibration, this would correspond to skeletalizing the category.

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Oct 21 2024 at 22:17):

If your question is if the fibers are discrete, then it is not the case as soon as the category on which we apply the Fam construction has a non-identity endomorphism. If we call such a morphism u:XXu : X \to X, then the morphism (Id:{}{},u)(\operatorname{Id} : \{*\} \to \{*\}, u) lives in the fiber of {}\{*\}. Or perhaps I don't understand your question.

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Oct 21 2024 at 22:19):

The fiber over a set II is the category CI\mathbf{C}^I.

view this post on Zulip Daniel Teixeira (Oct 21 2024 at 22:21):

oh, okay, I'm not familiar with this I guess I just misunderstood the construction at the 1lab

view this post on Zulip Vincent Moreau (Oct 21 2024 at 22:25):

As a reference, there is Categorical Logic and Type Theory by Jacobs, where the family fibration is described in section 1.2.