You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Given and [[Grothendieck fibrations]], a morphism is a fibration between them (in the sense of [[fibration in a 2-category]]) iff makes the evident triangle commute and is a Grothendieck fibration itself. That's a well-known theorem proven, for instance in this paper by Hermida.
In particular this theorem tells us that we don't need to check wheter preserves -cartesian arrows. If it is a fibration, then the following commutes automatically (for any in ):
image.png
On the other hand, each is itself a fibration, so one might wonder whether the above square witnesses being a map of fibrations. In other words, does preserve -cartesian arrows?
Yes, this should be true, if you construct the action of on arrows by factoring through cartesian arrows and then use the fact that cartesian arrows are cancelable on one side.
Thanks Mike! Though I don't think I understand what you mean by 'cartesian arrows are cancelable on one side'.
If and are cartesian, then is cartesian.