You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is the delooping defined for objects in a 'categories with homotopies' the same thing as the delooping defined for monoidal categories?
By 'categories with homotopies' I mean either model cats or -cats (Lurie-Joyal style).
I would say... yes? Conjecturally, the latter delooping would be the delooping as done in , if this makes sense.
Problem is, I don't know how would I go proving this? It amounts to showing that, given a monoidal (-)category , its delooping is (equivalent to) its suspension, i.e. the homotopy pushout of .
Is this related to the delooping hypothesis?
I won't exactly answer your questions, but I'll say some stuff that may help (or maybe you already know it):
In topology looping is adjoint to suspension. Looping only becomes inverse to suspension in the 'stable' context, e.g. for infinite loop spaces: a space of loops in a space of loops in a space of loops in...
Delooping takes a topological monoid , or more generally an -space (a topological monoid up to coherent homotopy), and creates a space such that is equivalent to the -space of loops in .
In higher category theory we also have operations of looping and suspension. Instead of describing them I'll just describe delooping. Delooping turns a k-tuply monoidal n-category into a (k-1)-tuply monoidal (n+1)-category with one object. For example, take k = 1, n = 1. Then delooping a monoidal category gives a bicategory with one object.
So, delooping moves us diagonally up and to the right in the periodic table:
The Periodic Table of n-Categories
Thank you John, you put the question in context in a much better way.
Thanks! I explained looping, delooping, and suspension a lot more carefully using the periodic table here:
I guess I need to understand some more homotopical algebra to be able to say if my question (a) true and (b) trivially true.
John Baez said:
Thanks! I explained looping, delooping, and suspension a lot more carefully using the periodic table here:
- John Baez and James Dolan, Categorification.
Also this seems to be very relevant! Thanks again
One thing I was trying to say just now is that delooping is only going to be equivalent to suspension if you're working with stable objects: infinite loop spaces, or spectra, or stable -categories, or stable -categories.
Loosely speaking, "stable" means "far down enough in the periodic table that you've reached the place where you see ditto signs".
So, delooping a monoidal -category, or monoidal -category, is really different from suspending it.
But for a symmetric monoidal -category, or a symmetric monoidal -category, they're equivalent.