Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: fibration over loose morphisms of a double category


view this post on Zulip Nathaniel Virgo (Sep 08 2024 at 07:48):

I seem to have a double category in which for each pair of objects, the category of loose morphisms between them is a fibration. (Loose means the dimension in which morphisms don't compose strictly.) It probably obeys some nice equations that I haven't worked out yet, which relate each of these fibrations to each other.

Do structures like this exist in the literature?

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Sep 08 2024 at 16:01):

What do you mean by saying that a category "is" a fibration? Being a fibration is a property of a functor.

view this post on Zulip Nathaniel Virgo (Sep 09 2024 at 04:58):

Right, sorry, that was a bit muddled. What I mean is, I have two double categories E\mathbb{E} and B\mathbb{B} that share the same set of objects, with an identity-on-objects strict (I think) double functor p:EBp:\mathbb{E\to B}, which I think of as forgetting information about the loose maps. This functor has the property that the induced functor Eloose(X,Y)Bloose(X,Y)\mathbb{E}_{loose}(X,Y)\to \mathbb{B}_{loose}(X,Y) is a fibration for each pair of objects X,YX,Y. (It's actually an opfibration rather an a fibration in my case, but I guess that doesn't make a lot of difference.)

But probably pp has other nice properties, such that we might want to call pp some kind of fibration itself. I guess I'm just being lazy and asking if anything like that exists in the literature already, so I can just go through and check it has the right properties without needing to work out what they should be.

B\mathbb{B} is an equipment if that makes a difference, and I expect that E\mathbb{E} is also. They both have a monoidal structure as well.

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Sep 09 2024 at 08:01):

This should be a special case of [[double fibration]] (special in being identity in the tight direction), since in those the category of loose arrows of E\mathbb E are fibred over the analogous category for B\mathbb B. So this gives you a fibration ploose:ElooseBloosep_{loose}:\mathbb E_{loose} \to \mathbb B_{loose}. Then you know the double functor respects boundaries of loose arrows so if you have a square between loose arrows with trivial tight boundaries, so a map α:fp(f):Xp(Y)\alpha : f \Rightarrow p(f'): X \nrightarrow p(Y'), you get a lift which is necessarily a loose arrow αf:αXY\alpha^*f' : \alpha^*X \nrightarrow Y', meaning that ploosep_{loose} restricts to local fibrations as you want.