You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Do the experts agree that the 8 coherence axioms in Marmolejo/Wood's No-Iteration Pseudomonads (Def. 2.1) are redundant? I think pseudomonads should have the same coherence theory -- and the 2 same axioms -- as monoidal categories (which seem to be their axioms 2 and 8), and Fiore/Gambino/Hyland/Winskel in Relative pseudomonads, Kleisli bicategories, and substitution monoidal structures (Def 3.1) seem to agree.
Yes, 3 of the 8 axioms are redundant. FGHW state this explicitly in Proposition 3.3. It is also observed in Lack and Street's On monads and warpings, as well as Walker's No-iteration pseudodistributive laws.
(Similarly, one their axioms for pseudoalgebras is redundant, as observed in the Lack and Street paper.)
Ahh I see, but axioms 4,6,7 are not redundant, but correspond to implicit naturality conditions in the FGHW paper. Thanks!