Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: cofunctors as profunctors


view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 09 2022 at 13:51):

Consider a profunctor P:BAP : B ⇸ A equipped with the following data:

From this data we can reconstruct a cofunctor φ:AB\varphi : A \nrightarrow B as follows:

Is there a nicer way to characterize the above data, and/or to reconstruct any of it given some property of PP?

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 09 2022 at 14:01):

Oh, and you go the other way as follows:

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (May 10 2022 at 06:47):

This is interesting! I'll have a think about it and post something later today / this week. Ping me if I forget!

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (May 10 2022 at 09:58):

James Deikun said:

So I'm a bit confused as to what this bit is trying to say. Could you provide some intuition as to what you mean?

view this post on Zulip Bryce Clarke (May 10 2022 at 10:00):

ff is a morphism from what to what? Below it looks like it is a morphism in BB, whereas here it appears to be a morphism of AA?

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 10 2022 at 11:59):

You're correct that below it is a morphism in BB. Here, though, it is f:aaf : a \to a'; basically (a,f)(a',f) is a unique dependent pair.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 10 2022 at 12:08):

The way I came up with it is thinking of the collage of PP where this is a factorization of sorts (not orthogonal) of morphisms that go from the AA-part to the BB-part. As seen below in the "other way" part, the pap_{a} are the lifts of identity morphisms through each aa, viewed as "heteromorphisms" from aa to φ0(a)\varphi_{0}(a). Because they are lifts of identity morphisms, they are also identity morphisms in aa. In fact I need to update that part because I messed it up; please check it again.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 10 2022 at 12:16):

Anyway the way lifts work is you compose with an "identity" on one side to turn the morphism in B into a heteromorphism (this part does most of the actual work) and then factor through an "identity" on the other side to turn it into a morphism in A.

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 10 2022 at 12:22):

As for how PP itself is put together from φ\varphi, this is what it looks like when you compose A(1,F)Λ(G,1)A(1,F) \circ \Lambda(G,1) for FF a bijective-on-objects functor and GG a discrete opfibration such that the span represents φ\varphi.

view this post on Zulip Tom Hirschowitz (May 10 2022 at 13:36):

Don't have enough time to look closely enough, but, just in case, this makes me think of [[two-sided discrete fibrations]]. You know about them, I guess?

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 12 2022 at 11:17):

I do know about them and their relevance to profunctors in general, but I'm not sure where you're specifically seeing them here.

view this post on Zulip Tom Hirschowitz (May 12 2022 at 15:46):

I was not, really. It was just a quick, vague intuition. Sorry if that was unclear, and even more sorry if it was bad intuition!

view this post on Zulip James Deikun (May 16 2022 at 13:02):

For comparison I decided to try to describe representable profunctors in a similar way:

A representable profunctor is a profunctor P:ABP : A ⇸ B equipped with the following data:

From this data we can reconstruct a functor F:ABF : A \to B as follows:

Other way: