You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
Is anyone aware of a proof that a braiding for a monoidal category is equivalent to the lax monoidality of the 'identity' from ?
It seems so involve a lot of diagram chasing and I'm lazy
Hmm, I know Joyal and Street's proof that a braided monoidal category is the same as a monoidal category in MonCat, but that's slightly different.
Is that an higher Eckmann-Hilton argument?
Matteo Capucci said:
Is anyone aware of a proof that a braiding for a monoidal category is equivalent to the lax monoidality of the 'identity' from ?
It seems so involve a lot of diagram chasing and I'm lazy
Btw, I don't know if this is actually true. My imagination got tickled by the fact that lax monoidal functors and braiding obey suspiciously similar hexagonal laws. However if you write down the two hexagons, they don't match on the nose.
It feels weird since how many ways could there be to arrange parenthesized triple products, associators and a natural transformation in two variables?
Matteo Capucci said:
Is that a higher Eckmann-Hilton argument?
Yes, it's in here on page 12.