You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
At [[Rel]], it is said that there is a lax bifunctor .
Is such a bifunctor actually strong? Afaiu it sends to .
Then while .
That's a proof 'in Set' but there's also a diagrammatic proof involving the lifting property of ortoghonal factorization system of the regular category C, and the fact that mono+regular epi = iso
Am I missing something?
Looks right to me.
FWIW Barr's embedding theorem should neatly justify the pointwise reasoning without worrying about the diagrammatic proof.
Or just the internal logic of a regular category.
Kevin Carlson said:
Barr's embedding theorem
ah cool, I didn't know about that
I'm gonna edit the nLab then