Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: adhesive + extensive


view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 01 2021 at 15:05):

Is there a "standard" term for a category which is both adhesive and extensive (or equivalently, adhesive with a strict initial object)?
Here by "standard" I mean with at least one pre-existing usage.

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 01 2021 at 15:08):

(Rationale: Any such category has a cd-structure whose distinguished squares are the pushouts of monomorphisms; what I really want is a name for the topology it generates. But this topology includes the empty family as a covering family of the initial object, and so it doesn't seem quite appropriate to call it the "adhesive topology", since an adhesive category doesn't have to have an initial object.)

view this post on Zulip Fawzi Hreiki (Jun 01 2021 at 17:07):

Sticky?

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 01 2021 at 18:21):

LOL, I thought about "adherent" (to imitate "coherent") but indeed there are many other synonyms for "adhesive" to consider!

view this post on Zulip Fawzi Hreiki (Jun 01 2021 at 21:04):

Do you have any examples of adhesive categories which aren't extensive. I see on the nLab page that any adhesive category with a strict initial object is extensive so I imagine most adjesive categories are extensive.

view this post on Zulip Reid Barton (Jun 01 2021 at 22:40):

Apparently pointed sets is an example

view this post on Zulip Spencer Breiner (Jun 01 2021 at 23:24):

When you pull back along the coproduct inclusions, you pick up two copies of the fiber over the distinguished point, but when you add them back together, only the distinguished points get re-merged. This is an interesting example since the pullbacks are coproduct inclusions, but not for the same coproduct decompositions.

view this post on Zulip Fawzi Hreiki (Jun 02 2021 at 02:53):

Oh nice. That’s a good one.