You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
If is accessible/locally presentable then it is well known that the category of categories enriched over is accessible/locally presentable. Is this assignment functorial?
More precisely: if is an accessible lax monoidal functor between accessible/locally presentable categories, is the induced functor accessible?
This is true for instance if is has a lax adjoint , in which case the adjunction lifts to an adjunction between the categories of enriched categories (and adjunctions are accessible).
What’s making you nervous about this? If is -accessible then isn’t as well just because -filtered colimits are computed the same on either side on objects and as -filtered colimits in or on homs?
well, I'm generally afraid of colimits in VCat, but with your encouragement I'll try to get my hands dirty tomorrow morning
Kevin Arlin said:
What’s making you nervous about this? If is $$\lambda-$$accessible then isn’t as well just because $$\lambda$$-filtered colimits are computed the same on either side on objects and as -filtered colimits in or on homs?
An annoying feature of this Zulip is that double dollars don't work unless they have spaces or dashes around them. E.g.
-accessible
works but
$$\lambda-$$accessible
does not. In the first case the dash is to the right of the closing double dollar sign.
Ah, thanks, John, I assumed that was just some of the bugginess people have been complaining about lately.
Daniel, that's a very healthy attitude in general but I'd argue the whole reason accessible categories and functors are so important is that filtered colimits are not scary; more precisely, in any accessible category they're calculated as in some presheaf category, and so they're basically just filtered colimits of sets, and so they're basically (in a rougher sense) just unions.