You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
For any category , denoting by the contravariant presheaf endofunctor on , we have the restriction functor along Yoneda . Because is small and Set is complete, this functor has a right adjoint given by right Kan extension. Now if I'm not mistaken, in this particular case, right Kan extension is given precisely by
. Is this right? Is it standard? Also, my tentative proof is not difficult, but it is set-based, hence the question: does this hold in any Yoneda structure (or variants thereof)?
We need to be a little careful about size, but your observation can be deduced both from (1) the theory of lax-idempotent pseudomonads; and (2) from the theory of Yoneda structures (which are closely related structures: see Walker and Di LibertiβLoregian).
(1) The presheaf construction on small categories extends to a pseudomonad on the 2-category of locally-small categories exhibiting free small-cocompletion. is lax-idempotent (as is the case for any pseudomonad expressing some cocompletion). It is a defining property of lax-idempotent pseudomonads that . That is the same as restriction of presheaves in this example can be seen by exhibiting both as left extensions. (Note that right adjoints are given by left extensions.)
(2) In the context of Yoneda structures, this observation is essentially Corollary 14 of StreetβWalters.
Brilliant, thanks!