You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
The categorical wreath product construction allows one to construct the categories inductively. In what generality does the wreath product make sense, i.e. for which categories other than ? I'm particularly interested in if one can make sense of , where is a skeleton of the category of finite pointed sets.
I'm sure I've seen some slightly-more-general-wreath-product-including-the-case-of-finite-sets before -- I want to say either in a Barwick paper or in an Ayala-Francis paper.
But the "ultimate" level of generality does seem rather mysterious...
ah, I found it in Ayala-Francis Factorization Homology I: Higher Categories. Thanks! This is less straightforward than I imagined :rofl:
Awesome! I was pretty hazy on the recollection there, glad it worked out!
it's quite inexplicit, though... i don't immediately see how to describe even
Not as general as possible, but there's an explicit description in https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002240491000157X
According to Remark 3.4 in https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0512575, the construction even yields a monoidal structure on and I think it goes as follows:
Let and be two functors (conveniently denoted with the same symbol). Here as an index denotes the cardinality (excluding the basepoint) of the finite set corresponding to this as an object of .
We define the objects of to be , where and .
Morphisms consist of a morphism in together with morphisms in for all such that under the map of finite sets dually corresponding to .
Finally, the functor sends to and a morphism to , where denotes the dual of .