Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Wreath products


view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Mar 10 2023 at 20:22):

The categorical wreath product construction Δ()\Delta \wr (-) allows one to construct the categories Θn\Theta_n inductively. In what generality does the wreath product make sense, i.e. for which categories other than Δ\Delta? I'm particularly interested in if one can make sense of F()\mathbb{F}_* \wr (-), where F\mathbb{F}_* is a skeleton of the category of finite pointed sets.

view this post on Zulip Tim Campion (Mar 10 2023 at 21:31):

I'm sure I've seen some slightly-more-general-wreath-product-including-the-case-of-finite-sets before -- I want to say either in a Barwick paper or in an Ayala-Francis paper.

view this post on Zulip Tim Campion (Mar 10 2023 at 21:32):

But the "ultimate" level of generality does seem rather mysterious...

view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Mar 10 2023 at 22:41):

ah, I found it in Ayala-Francis Factorization Homology I: Higher Categories. Thanks! This is less straightforward than I imagined :rofl:

view this post on Zulip Tim Campion (Mar 10 2023 at 23:30):

Awesome! I was pretty hazy on the recollection there, glad it worked out!

view this post on Zulip Reuben Stern (they/them) (Mar 10 2023 at 23:32):

it's quite inexplicit, though... i don't immediately see how to describe even FinFin\mathsf{Fin}_* \wr \mathsf{Fin}_*

view this post on Zulip Fernando Yamauti (Mar 11 2023 at 02:27):

Not as general as possible, but there's an explicit description in https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002240491000157X

view this post on Zulip Heiko Braun (Jun 26 2023 at 14:18):

According to Remark 3.4 in https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0512575, the construction even yields a monoidal structure on Cat/Γ\mathsf{Cat}/\Gamma and I think it goes as follows:
Let # ⁣:CΓ\# \colon \mathcal{C} \to \Gamma and # ⁣:DΓ=Finop\# \colon \mathcal{D} \to \Gamma = \mathsf{Fin}_{\ast}^{op} be two functors (conveniently denoted with the same symbol). Here #c\# c as an index denotes the cardinality (excluding the basepoint) of the finite set corresponding to this as an object of Γ\Gamma.
We define the objects of CD\mathcal{C} \wr \mathcal{D} to be (c;d1,,d#c)(c; d_1, \dots, d_{\# c}), where cCc \in \mathcal{C} and dkDd_k \in \mathcal{D}.
Morphisms (c;d1,,d#c)(c;d1,,d#c)(c; d_1, \dots, d_{\# c}) \to (c'; d'_1, \dots, d'_{\# c'}) consist of a morphism f ⁣:#c#cf \colon \# c \to \# c' in C\mathcal{C} together with morphisms fij ⁣:djdif_{ij} \colon d_{j} \to d_{i} in D\mathcal{D} for all i,ji, j such that iji \mapsto j under the map of finite sets dually corresponding to #f\# f.
Finally, the functor CD\mathcal{C} \wr \mathcal{D} sends (c;d1,,d#c)(c; d_1, \dots, d_{\# c}) to 1k#c#dk\bigvee_{1 \leq k \leq \# c} \# d_{k} and a morphism (f;(fij))(f; (f_{ij})) to 1k#cfij#\bigvee_{1 \leq k \leq \# c} f^\#_{ij}, where fij#f^\#_{ij} denotes the dual of #f\# f.