You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.
When is the canonical comparison associated with a right Kan extension an equivalence?
Let
be functors, and suppose that the right Kan extension
exists.
Moreover, assume that admits a fully faithful left adjoint
so that
Writing
for the counit, there is a canonical comparison functor
which sends an object of to the morphism
In some cases, this comparison is an equivalence:
Thus the same functor plays two different universal roles:
My question is the following.
Has this phenomenon been studied in general? More precisely, are there known categorical conditions on
ensuring that the canonical comparison
is an equivalence?
Thanks for your answers, and please be indulgent if there is something obvious or very well-known that I am missing!
The only case I can think of is when is terminal and is an equivalence. Do you know any other examples?
Yes, for instance: let be any category and
One has
so that
On the other hand
Other examples can be produced similarly...
This topic was moved to #learning: questions > When a Kan = Comma? by John Baez.