Category Theory
Zulip Server
Archive

You're reading the public-facing archive of the Category Theory Zulip server.
To join the server you need an invite. Anybody can get an invite by contacting Matteo Capucci at name dot surname at gmail dot com.
For all things related to this archive refer to the same person.


Stream: theory: category theory

Topic: Tricategories and n-categories


view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Jan 29 2024 at 14:09):

What are the known notions of n-category which directly subsume tricategories in an evident way?
I don't mean up to Quillen equivalence, I mean any theorem I want to prove about tricategories, I can prove about these n-categories and I'll get the result for tricategories. I think this requirement implies that I only care about "algebraic" models here unless there's an obvious way to "bias" the geometric model to become algebraic.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jan 29 2024 at 16:44):

I think the only one that can do that is a Batanin-Leinster algebra for a suitably chosen globular operad.

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Jan 30 2024 at 09:37):

Noob question, but why isn't this 'trivially' the case? I was expecting all definitions of weak n-categories to specialize to tri- and bicategories!

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Jan 30 2024 at 13:22):

Some models of higher cats are very different shapes than ordinary cats, like quasicategories are just geometrically very different looking than the usual categories.
Like say you have a coherence condition in a bi category that asserts that a pasting diagram commutes (two disks with the same boundary are equal)
and at level 3 you want to weaken this to a 3 cell between the disks (two disks are homotopic by a 3 cell)
At this point it may not be even necessary to demand that you have a unique composite of the pasting diagrams on both sides (i.e. two well defined disks) before you have a morphism between them, and indeed demanding to choose a composite is kind of awkward because the composite of a pasting diagram involves choosing arbitrary composition orders for the morphisms involved. instead you could define a 3 cell directly in terms of the pasting diagrams themselves. So the shape of a 3 cell is no longer a map between 2 cells but a more complicated structure relating pasting diagrams of 2 cells.

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Jan 30 2024 at 13:23):

In quasicategories a 2 cell is a filler for a triangle of 1 cells, a 3 cell is a filler for a tetrahedron whose faces are 2 cells and so on

view this post on Zulip Patrick Nicodemus (Jan 30 2024 at 13:31):

Or you could define composition so that we don't have a single designated composite but it's only defined by a universal property. I think opetopes do this.

view this post on Zulip Matteo Capucci (he/him) (Jan 30 2024 at 14:02):

Uhm I see, makes sense

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jan 30 2024 at 17:08):

Any correct definition of n-categories has to specialize to tricategories up to "Quillen" equivalence, but Patrick specified that's not the question he's asking now.

view this post on Zulip Mike Shulman (Jan 30 2024 at 17:08):

(I put it in quotes because I'm not sure anyone has actually written down a Quillen model structure for tricategories.)

view this post on Zulip Kevin Arlin (Jan 30 2024 at 17:42):

Indeed quasicategories also don't have single designated composites, and to the extent the composites even have universal properties it's quite implicit.